AKAM Post of the Day

The following was first posted on The Motley Fool Akamai board.
It was then selected as Post of the Day
http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2008/080220.htm
I like Akamai even more after their legal win against LLNW.

Akamai

Past Margins
Transcript

In the fourth quarter, we earned $0.41 per diluted share on a normalized basis. That's a 52% increase year over year and a $0.07 increase over the prior quarter. Our normalized weighted average diluted share count for the fourth quarter was 186.7 million shares.

Big Charts with EPS and P/E: http://tinyurl.com/yqhk6l

Earnings Est	Current	Qtr
	7-Dec	8-Mar	7-Dec	8-Dec
Avg. Estimate	0.37	0.38	1.29	1.66
Low Estimate	0.36	0.37	1.26	1.57
High Estimate	0.38	0.39	1.3	1.76
Year Ago EPS	0.27	0.28	0.88	1.29

http://au.finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=AKAM

Thoughts:
Analysts will be raising estimates .
When we spoke with you last fall, we guided to 25% to 30% growth for 2008. Given our strong fourth quarter, this implies a higher revenue number so we are raising our 2008 full year revenue guidance to between $800 million and $825 million, or 26% to 30% annual growth. We expect our normalized net income to grow in line with or slightly faster than our revenue growth, or 27% to 31% on a year-over-year basis. This implies normalized EPS in 2008 of $1.65 to $1.70, or 25% to 29% annual growth.

Previous earnings http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&ticker=akam
No seasonality, good consistent growth. Occasional flat quarter
.41 .43 .47 .49 - 1.80 * p/e 30 =$54
Sell at 40 p/e - $72

Using cp's 20 p/e then $36 would be fair, so current price only offers small mos.

Here are some old thoughts I posted on the Akam Rule breaker board. They were part of a fun discussion.

Some quick bearish retorts.

There is lots of room for many players in the CDN space.
Yeah right, ‘cos technological companies all play so nicely in the same pit...not. They will throw sand in each others eyes, cry out to daddy and then get out and eat others lunch. Unfortunately due to all the sand throwing and competition for the best area of the sandpit their lunches will have a lot of sand on them and only half will be edible. All the excitement will attract other kids to the action. Result: Growth in content delivery will require continued high capital expenditures while revenues will not grow at the same pace. Margins will fall and thus net income will grow slower than hoped.

Akamai is the 800lb gorilla.
How many times has a technology innovator been overtaken by an imitator? As I don't have enough fingers or toes to count that high, maybe I should ask how many times as the innovator actually gone on to dominate long term? Thinking...thinking...ummm still thinking...you guys and gals will have to help me here as I can't think of one...hold that thought I've got one Dell.

To make this easier for myself I think I'll just use Karl's excellent post as a starting point.
1 - They're the one with the reputation.
Yeah the reputation for gouging a huge fees from their customers.

2 - They ARE the 800lb gorilla of CDN's
See above

3 - They've got that globally distributed network of servers that can't be beat. Talk about a barrier of entry for a business that wants to take on Akamai!
Yes they do have what Limelight's centralized network has shown to be an outdated model. Distributed simply means harder to maintain and more costly to update, which they'll need to continuously do. Companies like Google continuously demonstrate that the next best model is just around the corner.

4 - They've got an entrenched client base. (We need to explore how difficult it really is for those clients to switch though.)
There hasn't been a lot of competition up to now and their long term contracts have protected them from churn. Watch this space.

5 - They've got a big pile of banana's to let them get through a price war/margin crunch.
True, but how's that working out for Netflix? Being an owner of a company is a price war is not a good place to be. Tech CEO's and boards really need to read Sun Tzu's Art of War. They need to find ways to defeat their competition without the wars.

5a - That big pile of banana's lets them build out their capabilities as needed, whether by R&D, acquisitions (eating the minkeys that taste good!), or just building out the number of servers when/where needed.
Acquisitions are seldom accretive to owners. Yes they will continue to spend a fortune on both R&D and capital; however, ROI from these activities is far from assured.

6 - Patents to protect the tech that's the source of those bananas.
They really need to prove this by winning the Limelight lawsuit. Until then all bets are off.

6a - Remember that big pile of banana's? That means they can afford to protect the patents by tossing a lawsuit at any minkey that gets too annoying, and they're not afraid to do it!
I haven't seen any minkeys showing much fear yet. Venture capitalists have continued to give Limelight more capital despite the lawsuits.

Best
Dean
Long AKAM

This first appeared as a post on Motley Fool board Falling Knives.
It was then selected as a Post of the Day
http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2008/080227.htm

I am still looking at Crocs.

Falling Knives
Dangers of Crocs

General Thoughts
I used to sit in the CROX is a fad and overpriced stock camp. Unless I turn up something rotten it now looks underpriced and about six months ago I stopped thinking they are a fad. Footwear is surprisingly important to a lot of people and not just women. CROX have carved out a great niche and appear to be expanding it nicely. Management seem to have made all the right moves in expanding their brand, so I am left wondering why it is now available at such a seemingly cheap price. Personally, after years of mocking Birkenstock wearers, I am slightly embarrassed to report that I am a convert to the German way, but please don't hold that against me. From talking to Croc wearers they feel the same about their Crocs.

Here in Australia the market has expanded very rapidly. First the groovers and practical people like nurses wore Crocs. Then the wanna-be trendsetters, then their kids, then the early majority and their kids and then they all went and bought a new colour.

That Kiwi guy on the Fab15 board has followed Crocs for a while, but he appears to be on holiday.

Valuation
There must be something seriously wrong with CROX or Mr. Market has forgotten to take his Cymbalta.

My earnings based intrinsic value spreadsheet spits out a weighted IV of $70 pricing CROX at over a 60% discount. So if ttm eps of $2 and analysts growth of 24% can be believed CROX is a screaming buy. My spreadsheet is based on Hewitt Heiserman's and weights the growth rates from 12% (half estimates) to 24%.

Trailing P/E: 14.46
Forward P/E: 8.11
PEG Ratio: 0.43
Price/Sales: 3.08
Enterprise Value/Revenue: 2.98
Enterprise Value/EBITDA: 9.503

So where is the hidden danger? Where is the risk at buying at this level?
Cash flows have been decimated by twin perils of rising inventory and rising A/R. Inventory has been blamed on distribution problems, which is totally plausible considering the growth. Rising A/R is not surprising considering the international growth; however, within the current retail environment this deserves a closer look.

Recent Recap
CROX peaked at $75 in October 2007. The sell-off began when they reported Q3 earnings http://www.crocs.com/company/press/2007/4/ I was not following CROX at the time so am not sure why it was punished so much for meeting/just beating estimates and issuing good forward guidance. My guess is that it could simply be the old high priced normally over delivering company getting slaughtered for not hitting the ball out of the park. CROX did have an incredibly high short level prior to earnings. They were also an overpriced momentum stock at that point so had to stumble at some point to let earnings catch up with expectations.

Q4 release appears similar, they failed to crush estimates and have been further sold off by now what is surely worried owners and people who have been trying to catch this falling knife.

Great post on CROX board with some history and addressing the whole fad question http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=26243849

A good take on rising inventory levels http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=26263464

Issues
Rising A/R
Fad
Rising Inventories

Looking Forward
I have not seen any academic or other studies on fallen growth stocks, but it would have to be very strong evidence to shake me from my anecdotal position. My experience leads me to believe once a high flying growth stock has been tossed aside it is unlikely to explode higher again in the near term. There is too much resistance from owners looking to get out at break even, too much supply around at higher prices. This is reinforced as once fallen, everyone starts believing the bears whose arguments are lent the credibility of recent price action. The crowing of I told you so is very disconcerting.

However, looking forward 1and 3 years out I see the following:
- Growth continues. Even if Crocs are a fad they still have a few more years left in them.
- The inventory issues are resolved, but expensive enterprise software solution impacts on net margins (total WAG)
- A/R continues to be a problem as growth continues.
- company continues to expand range, reducing likelihood of fad.
- Earnings increase and the market pays a fair price for those earnings.
2008 earnings of $2.70, still growing over 20%, target $50
2010 earnings of $3.50, still growing 20%, target $70

Conclusion
I have not seen anything yet to make this a less compelling investment; however, I have only looked for an hour or so. The greatest long term danger is the durability of the brand, but I have seen no real signs of slowing growth so that is fancy rather than fact. With such a compelling opportunity now I would be surprised if more people here are not looking closely at CROX and I look forward to hearing their views.

Resources
Q4 Transcript http://seekingalpha.com/article/65233-crocs-inc-q4-2007-earnings-call-transcript
Q4 Release http://www.crocs.com/company/press/2007/4/
Q3 10Q http://tinyurl.com/3bcvw2
12 month short interest http://tinyurl.com/327834 still peaking
Big Charts 2 year P/E and eps http://tinyurl.com/3ccq6w
Reuters ratios http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/ratios.asp?rpc=66&symbol=CROX

http://tinyurl.com/yt5b9x

ASX catches a cold

I love days like today. ASX indexes are down over 2% and fear is entering the market. My sale of NAB at $36 or $37 including options premium looks like great with NAB trading down today to $34. I will continue to stay on the sidelines for great opportunities to present, just like it did when NAB was trading under $30.

Keep powder dry and wait for bargains to appear.

Figuring out trading range

Posted by Bakuv http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=23934359&recscode=2

Ok, since I can be dense sometimes, mind if I restate the trading range methodology using USANA as an example?

1) Record the ttm EPS for the 3Q: $1.90
2) Record the low and high trading prices following the release of 3Q results until the 4Q results are released: $37.30 and $47.36
3) Establish PE range for the trading range following the known EPS: 19.63 (=37.20/1.90) to 24.92 (=47.36/1.90)
4) Record the ttm EPS for the 4Q: $1.98
5) Apply previous PE range from step 3 to just released 4Q ttm EPS of 1.98 to get new trading range until next quarter's results are announced: 38.87 (=19.63*1.98) to $49.34 (=24.92*1.98) (btw, I came up with a different low end of the trading range, 38.87 instead of 38.26)
6) Can throw out extreme low and high prices based on common sense and use prices that are more realistic
7) Record events that cause price fluctuation in order to "price" news.
8) Rinse and repeat each quarter

CTRP fears

Orignally posted on CTRP board at Fool SA. http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=23931220

Just came here on the trail of nikita02445 who had a board created, named and posted to by her.
"PS - I know this is probably a stupid question, but when is there first quarter?"

First quarter is generally Jan-Mar each year, with lots of exceptions. Individual companies can have first quarter when ever they want, so some might be giving their third quarter numbers during the first quarter!! Some countries have different first quarters where companies must align with Fedral tax laws, exceptions are such a drag, why can't we just have rules!! Did you know that some things that many Americans think of as the rule or the norm is from a global perspective the exception. Metrics rule. Just think how hard all this stock investing would be if it was still in fractions!!

Great post on pandemic nikita. TysonL any chance of paragraph or two summing up False Alarm: The Truth About the Epidemic of Fear.? My partner is a Biotech project manager and is doing a Masters in Drug Development. She is the least easily influenced person I know and has an excellent mind. As she doesn't have any vested interest, her opinion is valuable to me. Almost everyone that has a loud voice in a massive topic like pandemics have vested interests, they are on one side.

Her view is, there will be lots of warning sign of the pandemic coming; first the virus needs to mutate to allow consistent human to human transmission. When that mutation happens you will still have a lot of time to prepare. Gee I must really pin her down on what a lot of time is, words like “a lot” are so meaningless due to their subjectivity. Avian flu is being so closely monitored that we will see the signs early. A pandemic will happen sometime.

My view is that it can't hurt to have some extra toilet paper, canned and dry goods lying around and hopefully you have a veggie garden, maybe some solar power, some water tanks (essential in Australia) a holiday home in some remote location, bottled gas and bbq, lots of guns (joking, though it really scares me that depending on the source somewhere around 32-39% of households contain at least one firearm), a stash of gold coins and many other things. It can't hurt unless you put all of that on credit card. Hopefully y'all know you shouldn't get in bad debt (debt that costs you), even if that's what your leaders consistently do.

I once read that at it's peak 50,000 people died a year on American roads. Imagine if the government and vested interest groups pushed that information as propaganda to create fear amongst motorists. Would you be more afraid to drive?

I also read that human's perception is strongly influence by recent events; we haven't had an epidemic since Spain hence we think it is unlikely to happen.

The evil pharmaceutical companies (I'm joking, my partner hates that phrase. Why is an entire industry so maligned 'cos a few bad practices amongst a few companies?)and there are several, Tamiflu is but one, will pump like never before.

Tired, should be sleeping eating anything but this. Hope that made some sense. I say act quickly when the signs are there, but do not live you life in fear. This is America's time, your window is closing, you can have a beautiful renaissance, you can make the coming century one to be rejoiced like the Italian Renaissance of the 15th century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Renaissance


Nikita, if you are still reading, your board on Gems is making a lot of people happy. I am one of them. If you have indeed left the hidden gems fold I hope they have arranged for you to at least read your board, or better have listened to your request for deeply discounted third, fourth etc subscriptions.

Nikita I am sure you know this, but did everyone already see this irony? http://www.ctrp.org/

PPS I am a paranoid guy who talks and writes as a way to think, so any view that I ever express is often not my strongest view, hope my off-track comments don't offend anyone, well really I hope that the level of fear in your country hasn't progressed so far that anyone could view this with a devil's light. I don't even know what a devil's light is.

Dean

AKAM thought

Posted http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=23790238&post=true

In case anyone wants to follow the Street's advice, why not get paid to do so.

April 25 Put options closed at .90 3 March

http://au.finance.yahoo.com/q/op?s=AKAM&m=2006-04

Trading costs aside that gives you $90 to place a limit order for every 100 shares you want to buy, e.g. 400 shares, you get $360 to wait.

- If AKAM keeps going up you get to pocket $360 and sell put the next month.

- If it goes down you have same risk as having bought the stock, except your cost is 24.10 (25-.9) instead of current 26.10.

- If it stays the same you pocket the $360.

Surely paying the right price is one of the main rules of successful investing and to me it appears like the analyst is simply trying to do that, buy at the right price.

I think AKAM is a great company and am currently long with Calls sold on 2/3 of position.

I may be way off track but has greed made you think the only direction AKAM can take is up? It might keep going up, but at some time it will have a fall, and it is then that I will be happy to buy more if the story is the same as now.

Update on NAB Call

March 36 NAB calls were sold for .65, as per post on Super Fund if these are called then Super Fund will sell April 36 or 37 NAB put. The funds form the Trust's share sale will be used to pay off the Trusts margin loan. The trust will wait for favourable purchases, with the assurance that it can call on the loan when any opportunity arises.

Short, but what variety.

Short, but what variety.
The markets are fully congested and ready for a big move. We believe this the move is going to be a strong down move and will position accordingly. There are lots of options to do this:
Sell Calls
Buy Puts
Combination of the above

Fool AKAM post

http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=23716775

Hi Tim

Firstly, thanks for the fantastic analysis and continued thought on Akami.

After your initial recommendation, I quickly jumped on board for the following reasons.

• High fixed costs business with expanding sales, resulting in expanding profitability, i.e. more of there sales fall straight to the bottom line.
• Although there are some competitive risks, I saw and still see 2006 as the first breakout year for web downloads, on the road to downloads that will dwarf those of today. There needs to be some Moore like formula for web downloads, maybe Akami’s formula.

So I saw a company in the sweet spot, a spot that should get sweeter over the next year or two. With this P/E should expand as more coverage and enthusiasm builds, so expanding earnings with rising P/E multiple can only mean big price increases.

So where are we now,

EPS TTM .52

Price 02-16-06 26.67

P/E TTM 51

EPS high est 06 0.71 ( a 36% increase)

P/E forward 37.6

EPS high est 07 0.94 ( year on year 32% increase)

P/E forward 2 28.37

Looking at this makes me think a few things:

• Are analyst’s estimates too low? With AKAM expanding sales and margin could they blow these numbers away? Maybe.
• If they meet estimates then in two years at today’s price they would still have a P/E of 28. As they had been growing at 30%+ for a number of years they may be rewarded with a higher P/E, lets say 40, putting price around $37.
• What happens if they have one missed estimate, Google starts to move in, Apple gives them the flick or general market conditions deteriorate? P/E will compress as investors enthusiasm wanes, lets say it comes down to TTM P/E of 30. That would take the price back to $16, using forward eps of .71 price would be $21.

Other thought:

• I agree with Tim Hart, Google will start finding things harder. They don’t have trust. Heck I don’t trust them, even though I use their sites everyday. So why don’t I trust them? Probably, as in desperation their competitors have started spreading rumours and innuendoes about their motives. I have no real reason to distrust them, but just like Microsoft I do. Is big bad?

Disclosure: I own AKAM and recently traded Feb 25 Calls for a profit of .50. I am now looking at August Calls.

Roll CRYP or be called

CRYP Feb 20 Call.
The story here is different than AKAM, as it will definitely be called in 2 days and we will still own 300 shares. CRYP has had an excellent run from its lows to current 23.59 USD 1.27 (5.69%)

• Dividend coming due. US$0.07 per common share. The dividend will be paid on March 15, 2006 to shareholders of record as at March 8, 2006. The ex-dividend date will be March 6, 2006
• Looks like can only get .1 - .4 credit. Even at .4 and with dividend covering trading costs, it is only a 2% return for risk of holding.

Roll at .4 credit, as $320 (2%, annual 24%) is worth the downside risk.

Should I roll that AKAM Call

AKAM Feb 25 Call expires in 3 days, should I roll it as current 25.10.

1. May or may not be called, but I want to make decision, not let market make it.
2. Capital Gains, when did I buy? 27/07/2005 so to far, but should consider Aug Calls, to see.
   
3. Is call for entire holding, ie will I still profit in any further upside? Yes entire 500.

• Mar Call credit - .80. or $385 Net, for 30 days on $25 OR 3.2%, annual 38%
• May Call credit - 1.85, 93 days, 7.4%, annual 29%
  
• Aug Call credit - 2.7, 184 days, 10.8%, annual 21%
  

Go for Aug Call, as if price rises substantially can buy back option after 27/07 and sell shares with capital gain concession.
If share neutral then made 21% annual return.
If share falls can buy back option for cheaper and sell share, so limits downside risk.

Down side little participation in upside, need to investigate further to decide on upside potential.
The figures are:

P/E (TTM)	48.88		P/Sales	13.38
P/E (Forward)	35.31		P/Cash Flow	45.73
Earnings/Share (EPS)	2.2		Book Value/Share	4.11
PEG	1.35		P/Book	6.07
Debt/Equity	0.32		Cash Flow/Share	0.55

Yes AKAM is a cash machine with digital delivery. Digitial delivery is gonna explode, but Google is about to pounce and all it takes is one hiccup for price to slide.

Sell AUG Call, look to sell March Put.

Sitting Tight

Hold Telstra and NAB. Stories are improving at both. Sell NAB calls if good oportunity.

Confused? I am...but holding steady

The trust's US account continues to outperform the main US indexes. The account in now about 18% in cash and has a short term aim of 25% cash until the picture clears in the US. Despite the large cash holding the trust has still been outperforming during up weeks. The main reason for this is superior stock selection based on Motley Fool recommendations combined with option trading to generate income for the account.

David Nicholls projects a weekly close below 1261 will move markets in to secular bear with a 25% drop in to 4 year low in October 06. Well 950 on S&P would be scary, if this does occur the trust will be big buyers at that point. The cash holding has been built up with this downside risk in mind. As we are still invested 80% we will profit if market continues higher.

On the positive side Stealth Stocks Dennis Slowether (sp?) and McMillan are pointing for an up year. Analysts are pointing to International stocks heading higher and US stocks lagging.

The trust is happy with their current positioning and looks to decrease holding on further rises.

Holding Telstra

The Trust will continue to hold Telstra. The latest pop in share price on news of T3 in encouraging that the trustees original investment thesis will be fulfilled. The trust will be able to sell some of it's holding over the average paid and will have netted the attractive dividends for that period. Despite being in the troubled Telecommunications industry the trustees had believed if as the largest shareholder the government had known any information that would have led them to believe $5.25 for not a realistic price for T3 then they would have stated that and lowered their price accordingly. However, despite having the knowledge they did not lower their price target. This resulted in the Trusts purchase of a volume and portfolio percentage of the shares far greater than they would normally allocate to an individual share. The other contributing factor was the announcement of the special dividend combining to form $.40 a year in franked dividend. Was that a bribe to unload shares by the company?

At any rate the dividend has been better than interest and as stated the trustees believe they will get to sell above the average price, some time in the future. They will look at call options on Telstra.

Near term technical positive developments would be 20 day cross 100 day, MACD rise above zero, ie share price go up.

Fundamental improvements looked for : Positive wireless and broadband trends, T3, dividend maintained, upside earnings.

A Saucerful of Secrets

A Saucerful of Secrets is not a technical analysis term, it's not the new pot and handle formation. It is the name of one of the best Pink Floyd albums either, one of the two PF albums on which Syd Barrett wove his twisted genius. The album reminds me of the markets in many ways, it takes many twists and turns and the market is most certainly a saucerful of secrets.

With NAB rising steadily off its $26 low 117 months ago to trade above $34.50 now is a good move. Along with three dividends totaling $2.49 plus franking credits, it has been a good investment.

The trust does intend to have numerous banking and investment holding over the years and does plan to hold these shares for a number of years. However, covered call options will be written when the trustees believe the shares have risen close to a short term high. Puts will be written to purchase stocks. Transactions will be executed based on some or all of the following considerations; technical and fundamental analysis, portfolio, tax and income.

Based on the belief that NAB is close to a near term high and it's shares will be able to be purchased for around current values within the next year the trustees will look at possible options priced at 35. As the MACD is rising the trustees are happy to to look for an entry over the coming weeks.

Pat on the back

The call made back in October was extremely accurate and profitable.

The trusts performace for the year was 5.68% comapred to 1.24 for the cubes and 3.01 for the spiders.

Investing against the tide - Selling Spider Puts

The trustees believe the US stock markets are ready to bounce, possibly quite high to S&P500 1280, over 100 points up form here. The risk profile is good for some speculation. When possible the trustees prefer to get paid up front and carry the risk, hence they have sold put options on the SPY at price points they believe the market will be considerable above at some point in the next five weeks. As options are time wasting even if the market goes down from the current 1176, trustees have 20 points of downside safety and with prepared loss of 4k more downside can be accepted. All advisors including Peter Foley by SMS from Sweden point to a bounce as markets are oversold.
Position was sized in to over several days and is now full allocation. As such it warrants daily monitoring. Trustees note that they DST as trading in US finishes and a more acceptable 8am rather that 6.00pm. Trustees prefer to speculate in US at end of session rather than start, as this provides ability and self control of placing limit orders more aggressively knowing that if not hit can reassess that trading day.

Keep your own cofidence

As I’ve said before Talking about your trades while still in them changes your behaviour. So here I am on dangerous ground talking about Telstra. I have bought at least 2/3 in to Telstra, and have just bought more at 4.30. I feel tricked by the government and Telstra, al my assumptions were based on information they both knew to be wrong. Although I have never joined a class action, despite being invited to do so dozens of times, this one really pisses me of. I should have applied that other great rule. If it looks to good to be true then it probably is just that. I’ll buy more if the share drops under 4.10-4.00 still cum dividend.

Don't try to catch a falling knife

Cliché’s are a wonderful memory device. If you knew and utilised scores of clichés throughout your life I am sure you would be good at lots things. Original thought is often not required, just RTFM (Read The Forking Manual).

Don't try to catch a falling knife

If a share is falling let it fall. Many shares often have a 100% low to high in a year, so don’t try to catch that falling share, look to buy on a rebound.

Take Telstra for example. It has fallen from over 5.25 to 4.26, but is that cheap, will the market take Telstra even lower. If only investing a little then because of commission you will only have one shot at the price so it is more important to wait for signs of support; like good levels of buying. You dno’t want to plunge in too early with your precious investment capital to cut yourself on that investing knife. Mixing my metaphor, let the knife hit the floor and then pick some shares up.

If you have more capital then you should try to buy in three lots, ie split your money over three buys, to average in a price. This reduces stress on trades, as if you guess to early first up, you are only 1/3 in the trade, if share quickly rebounds you have some money in and can add the rest and so on.

Making money

Making money is easy.
A teenager can do it, or at least make a start.
So if it is that easy why aren't you doing it. Why can't you do it? Are you lazy, sub-normal, disadvantaged, content, too busy, just not your think?

Making money is so easy you can do it while you sleep, you can do it with other people's money. While you sleep I say, are you too lazy for that?

The easiest laziest way to make money is to embrace time. Like a good garden and scores of other things, making money takes time, day to day time and the span of time over years.

If you buy a lotto ticket, then you want more money and yet you are giving money away every time. So the effect is you are getting further away from what you want, by paying for a tiny piece of paper, 'cos that is all you are really ever going to get by playing the lotto. Save that money and all the other money you are wasting, get some money management knowledge by reading or asking and you will be rich in 15 years time, 20 if you are starting from under water.

Money is nothing, but the time it buys is everything. Time is life.